It clearly is, to any culture based around the family unit.

The point to remember is that there is nothing inherently wrong with immorality,

and obviously the measure of morality changes with each generation.

Couple that with a woman who has learned the business, and there is no way on gawd's green earth you are going to be able to turn a loose-moraled woman into a high-moraled partner (while you're not there at least).

So... moral or not can we agree that looking for love at the HDR is probably not going to work out?

Way too deep for me! Just enjoy life. Don't over think it.

Ethics is not only about the family unit but ordering societies in general.

Morality, not ethics. Very different things. Stay on topic.



No I`m not going to remember that. The notion of immorality in and of itself involves making value judgments. I do find something inherently wrong with the actions of Hitler and Charles Manson. I`m not on the relativist "you`re truth is your truth, my truth is my truth, leave me the Phuck alone" bandwagon... There are universals though prohibitions on prostitution are not among them. For example it was an integral part of some ancient pagan religions. Another example is the absense of many moral tenants related to private property in Native American cultures.

Why is it when someone has a weak argument to make, they feel the need to go over the top with connections to Nazis?? I suggest you look up the word 'inherent' and then practice reading comprehension before posting silliness.



Sure that exists as the distinction between conservatism and progress. Some generations have valued courage more than compassion and vica versa though both values existed in each.

ok, and ...

To touch on the question at hand, do you believe the hookers are less moral than you?

Admittedly beyond small doses it`s not a good use of time. These sort of chicken and egg wordplay debates are all over the internet and often involve atheists against theists. There`s no end to it...

I was though compelled to object to any notion that the Johns have some higher moral ground than the hookers. Hogwash.

I don't consider prostitution to be immoral, whether buying or selling. Religious prudes have tried to shame us and feminazis have tried to criminalize us, and I consider THEM to be the immoral scumbags.

I think these girls are capable of "loving" us in a casual sort of way, but if you are expecting some kind of loyal monogamous relationship with them, then you crack me up.

Wow sounds like a moral judgment to me, so much for something that doesn`t exist...

So what sort of "moraled" person are you when it comes to sex? While we are talking degrees, set up a scale for us...

Matt, would you permit your wife to whore, since it is not immoral? After all, it's just about the money.

My wife? I'm probadly too cynical for that.

If you are married, obviously there are other considerations, but this does not change my argument that prostitution by itself is morally acceptable.

Bud, Stripping for money is not morally acceptable in the USA, but legal. Things morally acceptable are usually not embarrassing to admit to in public. Not too many moms and dads want to say that their daughter strips in order to pay for college. However, current society doesn't really care much anymore.